/ instituut voor de Nederlandse taal / Taalportaal
bibliography glossary about
  • Dutch1
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
    8.3.1.On the notion of adverb
    quickinfo

    There is little agreement in the literature on the question as to whether we should distinguish a separate category of adverbs. Proponents of the position that we should, e.g., Haeseryn et al. (1997:451) and Ernst (2002:8), define this presumed word class as consisting of lexical elements (and perhaps phrases) that can only function as adverbials. Nevertheless, it is customary for grammars to include elements in the set of adverbs that do not satisfy this criterion. Haeseryn et al. (1997:454), for instance, list the form morgen'tomorrow' in examples such as (137a) as an adverb despite the fact that example (137b) shows that it can occur as the complement of a preposition. Because complements of prepositions are typically nominal, the examples in (137) should lead us to the conclusion that morgen is not an adverb but a noun.

    137
    a. Jan gaat morgen weg.
      Jan goes  tomorrow  away
      'Jan is leaving tomorrow.'
    b. Jan gaat pas na morgen weg.
      Jan goes  only  after tomorrow  away
      'Jan will only be leaving after tomorrow.'

    Another criterion that is sometimes used is that adverbs are invariant in form. This can be found in Haeseryn et al. (1997:451) but the same grammar simultaneously claims that certain adverbs such as the manner adverb snel'fast' and the frequentative adverb vaak'often' in (138) do allow comparative and superlative formation. Given this, there is no clear reason not to call these lexical items adjectives.

    138
    a. Jan wandelt snel/sneller.
      Jan walks  fast/faster
      'Jan is walking fast/faster.'
    b. Jan komt vaak/vaker bij zijn moeder.
      Jan comes  often/more.often  with his mother
      'Jan visits his mother often/more often.'

    Haeseryn et al. (1997:454) contrast “spurious” adverbs such as snel'quick' and vaak'often' in (138) with true adverbs, which are invariant in form. They illustrate these “true” adverbs by means of the locational elements buiten'outside' and hier'here' in (139a). However, the fact that the form of buiten is invariant also follows if we assume that it is actually a preposition, just as buiten in Jan speelt graag buiten het gebouw'Jan likes to play outside the building'. Furthermore, the fact that hier'here' in example (139b) is invariant is due to the fact that we are dealing with a proform: in this respect, locational pro-forms simply behave like pronouns such as hij'he' and hem'him'. That we should not consider the elements buiten and hier to be adverbs is also supported by the fact that they can also be used in other syntactic functions; this is illustrated in the primed examples in (139) by means of the verb zetten'to put', which obligatorily selects a complementive.

    139
    a. Jan speelt graag buiten.
      Jan plays  gladly  outside
      'Jan likes to play outside.'
    a'. Jan zet de bloemen buiten.
      Jan puts  the flowers  outside
      'Jan is putting the flowers outside.'
    b. Jan speelt hier graag.
      Jan plays  here  gladly
      'Jan likes to play here.'
    b'. Jan heeft de bloemen hier gezet.
      Jan has  the flowers here  put
      'Jan has put the flowers here.'

    Since lexical items used as adverbial phrases have no characteristic morphological features either, there is hardly any reason for assuming a separate category of adverbs for Dutch; they can normally be analyzed as a noun, as morgen'tomorrow' in (137a), an adjective, as snel'fast' and vaak'often' in (138), or a preposition, as buiten'outside' in (139a), while many of the remaining cases are pro-forms. We therefore provisionally conclude that the category of adverbs does not exist (although we will keep using this notion for convenience); we refer the reader to Section N8.2, A8, and P1.2.4 for more relevant discussion. Nevertheless, the following two sections will occasionally point out forms for which it is not easy and perhaps even impossible to determine to what category they belong: the existence of these forms shows that the question as to whether we need a separate category of adverbs is still not fully answered.

    readmore
    References:
    • Ernst, Thomas2002The syntax of adjunctsCambridge (UK)/New YorkCambridge University Press
    • Haeseryn, Walter, Romijn, Kirsten, Geerts, Guido, Rooij, Jaap de & Toorn, Maarten C. van den1997Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunstGroningenNijhoff
    • Haeseryn, Walter, Romijn, Kirsten, Geerts, Guido, Rooij, Jaap de & Toorn, Maarten C. van den1997Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunstGroningenNijhoff
    • Haeseryn, Walter, Romijn, Kirsten, Geerts, Guido, Rooij, Jaap de & Toorn, Maarten C. van den1997Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunstGroningenNijhoff
    • Haeseryn, Walter, Romijn, Kirsten, Geerts, Guido, Rooij, Jaap de & Toorn, Maarten C. van den1997Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunstGroningenNijhoff
    About this article
    Author(s): Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver
    Category: Dutch Syntax
    Keywords: Adverb
    Version: 1.0, January 2016
    Version history:
    version editor(s) date remarks
    1.0 Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver January 2016
    report errorprintcite
    Jump to:
    X