• Dutch1
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
Modification by a quantifier
quickinfo

The content noun may not be modified by a universal quantifier in a bare partitive construction, nor by a negative quantifier.

readmore

The following pair of examples shows that the content noun in a bare partitive construction resists modification by a universal quantifier, whereas this is fine in a prepositional partitive construction:

1
a. *It blik alle flikken
the tin all chocolate.drops
The tin of all chocolate drops
b. It blik mei alle flikken
the tin with all chocolate.drops
The tin with all chocolate drops (in it)

The same is illustrated below for the negative quantifier:

2
*It blik gjin flikken
the tin no chocolate.drops
The tin with no chocolate drops

In this case, the preposition is also excluded. Instead, the negative preposition must be used:

3
a. ?*It blik mei gjin flikken
the tin with no chocolate.drops
The tin with no chocolate drops (in it)
b. It blik sûnder flikken
the can without chocolate.drops
The tin without chocolate drops (in it)

The effect of having to use the negative preposition is obviated by modifying the negative quantifier:

4
In blik mei hast gjin flikken
a tin with almost no chocolate.drops
A tin with hardly any chocolate drops

Such examples sound slightly more natural if the phrase deryn in it is added:

5
In blik mei hast gjin flikken deryn
a tin with almost no chocolate.drops R.in
A tin with almost no chocolate drops in it
References
    printreport errorcite