• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
Consecutivity
quickinfo

The event described in the adjunct Imperativus-pro-Infinitivo (IPI) must be consecutive to the event described in the clause containing it.

readmore

The event described in the adjunct IPI must be consecutive to the event described in the clause containing it. Now, the modal kinne can may have the interpretation of ability, and in this use it can refer to two unrelated abilities, that is, there is no temporal relation of consecutivity. In that case, an IPI is not grammatical, as shown in (1):

1
a. Dizze jonge atleet kin de fjouwerdaachse rinne en de alvestêdetocht ride
this young athlete can the 4-deis walk and the eleven.cities.tour ride
This young athlete can walk the four day tour and skate the eleven cities tour
b. ?*Dizze jonge atleet kin de fjouwerdaachse rinne en ryd de alvestêdetocht
this young athlete can the 4-deis walk and skate the eleven.cities.tour
This young athlete can walk the four day tour and skate the eleven cities tour

There has been a lot of discussion about the question as to whether an adjunct IPI has a purposive interpretation. The consensus is that an IPI is not an infinitival clause of purpose. A true infinitival clause of purpose cannot be replaced by an IPI:

2
a. Ik gie nei Bommel om de brêge te sjen
I went to Bommels for the bridge to see
I went to Bommel (in order) to see the bridge
b. *Ik gie nei Bommel en sjoch de brêge
I went to Bommel and see the bridge
I went to Bommel (in order) to see the bridge

However, although it does not entail purpose, the adjunct IPI often allows a pragmatic inference of purpose. This is clear from many example sentences, and from the IPI-construction selected by the verb hinnegean go.

References
    printreport errorcite