• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
No movement out of the IPI-construction
quickinfo

Nothing can be moved out of an Imperativus-pro-Infinitivo (IPI)-construction.

readmore

Nothing can be moved out of an IPI-construction, as is illustrated by the ungrammaticality of the examples in (1) and (2) involving extraction of the direct object as an instance of question formation. The example below involves an adjunct IPI:

1
a. De plysje soe nei Deinum ta gean [en hâld de man oan fanwege wapenbesit]
the police would to Deinum to go and hold the man up for weapon.possession
The police was going to go to Deinum and arrest the man because of possession of firearms
b. *Wa soe de plysje nei Deinum ta gean [en hâld oan fanwege wapenbesit]?
who would the police to Deinum to go and hold up for weapon.possession
Who would the police go to Deinum and arrest because of possession of firearms?

The example below involves an argument IPI:

2
a. Se hawwe besocht [en set de man finzen fanwege wapenbesit]
they have tried and put the man in.prison for weapon.possession
They have tried and put the man in jail because of possession of firearms
b. *Wa hawwe se besocht [en set finzen fanwege wapenbesit]?
who have they tried and put in-prison for weapon.possession
Who did they try and put in jail because of possession of firearms?

It is perfectly grammatical to perform a similar extraction out of a to-infinitival clause:

3
Wa hawwe se besocht (om) finzen te setten fanwege wapenbesit?
who have they tried (for) in.prison to put for weapon.possession
Who did they try to put in jail because of possession of firearms?
References
    printreport errorcite