This topic deals with cardinals. Cardinal numbers are numerals used for counting things. Examples are ienone, tolvetwelve and hûnderthundred. This topic consists of eight sections. The first section explains how cardinals are formed. The second section gives an overview of the allomorphs that can occur within the cardinals. The third section deals with the word order within cardinals: in English it is twenty-five, but in Frisian 5 is pronounced first and linked to 20 by a coordinating conjunction enand. This results in fiifentweintichfive.and.twenty.
Cardinals may occur in some elliptic constructions: as clocktimes (fourth section): fiif oer fivenfive minutes past five, as persons (fifth section): mei har fjouwerenwith the four of them and as parts (sixth section): it skip bruts yn trijenthe ship broke into three parts.
Cardinals can also occur in the idiomatic construction in N of Num: in dei of tsienten days or so; this wil be dealt with in the seventh section. Finally, in the eighth section, the morphological potential of cardinals will be discussed.
The cardinal numbers are productively formed on the basis of fourteen free morphemes:
Free morphemes | Translation |
ien | one |
twa | two |
trije | three |
fjouwer | four |
fiif | five |
seis | six |
sân | seven |
acht | eight |
njoggen | nine |
tsien | ten |
alve | eleven |
tolve | twelve |
hûndert | hundred |
tûzen | thousand |
The suffix -tich (pronounced [təχ]) makes names for powers of ten. It is like English -ty (as in forty), German -zig (as in vierzigforty) and Dutch -tig (as in veertigforty) in that it is etymologically related to -tien, -ten, -zehn. The bound morphemes-oen-on and -ard-ard are used with milj-mill-, etc. to build internationalisms like miljoenmillion, miljardbillion and biljoenten to the power twelve.
Morphemes are combined by something that looks like compounding but with a different semantics: it is not intersective but is rather additive (sech(s)-tjin = 6+10) or multiplicative at other times (seis-hûndert = 6*100). The element -en- looks exactly like coordinating enand but it has a restricted, i.e. additive, semantics: twa-en-tritichtwo.and.thirtythirty two, hûndert(en)seishundred.(and).sixone hundred and six. The conjunction element en can be omitted in numbers above 100. For example, hûndertentsienone hundred and ten and hundertsien are both grammatical. In numbers below 100, the conjunction element is obligatory: ienentweintichtwenty-one vs *ientwintichtwenty-one. Another difference between these numbers is that above 100, the <e> in en is pronounced as [ɛ], below 100 it is pronounced as [ə].
The following table gives an impression of the basic pattern:
1 | ien | 12 | tolve (tolf) | 30 | tritich |
2 | twa | 13 | trettjin | 40 | fjirtich |
3 | trije | 14 | fjirtjin | 50 | fyftich |
4 | fjouwer | 15 | fyftjin | 60 | sechtich |
5 | fiif | 16 | sechtjin | 70 | santich |
6 | seis | 17 | santjin | 80 | tachtich |
7 | sân | 18 | achttjin | 90 | njoggentich |
8 | acht | 19 | njoggentjin | 100 | hûndert |
9 | njoggen | 20 | tweintich | 1000 | tûzen |
10 | tsien | 21 | ienentweintich | 1.000.000 | miljoen |
11 | alve (âlf) | 22 | twaentweintich | 1.000.000.000 | miljard |
Some of the vowels of the single numbers that undergo shortening or breaking display allomorphy among them as a result, when they are used as the left-hand member of a higher number. Twa[twa:]two may be shortened to [twa] if used attributively, for instance in twa boekentwo books. It has an allomorphtwein- or twin- in tweintich/twintichtwenty. For trijethree there is tret- in trettjinthirteen and tri- in tritichthirty; for fjouwerfour there is fjir- in fjirtjinfourteen and fjirtichforty; for fiif the vowel is shortened tofyf-/fif/ or even further rounded to /fyf-/ in fyftjinfifteen and fyftichfifty; for seissix there is sech(s)- in sech(s)tjinsixteen and sech(s)tichsixty. Sânseven is shortened to san-/sɔn-/ in santjinseventeen and santichseventy and for achteight there is tacht- in tachticheighty. Njoggen[njoɣən]nine may be heavily shortened in njoggentjin19 and njoggentich90 to [njon], or also with a centralizing diphthong to [njo.ən]. Frisian has a few more numbers with allomorphs than Dutch. For more information about shortening and breaking, see Allomorphy in Frisian: 'broken and 'shortened' forms.
The number ienone undergoes breaking when it becomes part of a larger number. So the number ienentritichone.and.thirtythirty one is pronounced as [jɪnn̩tritəx], also with a syllabic consonant [n]. Furthermore, tsienten was historically subject to breaking in the numbers trettjinthirteen, fjirtjinfourteen, fyftjinfifteen, sech(s)tjinsixteen, santjinseventeen, achttjineighteen and njoggentjinnineteen.
In cardinals between 12 and 20, the word order is low-high (five plus ten: fyftjinfifteen) and the semantics is additive. In the names of the units of 10, the order is [stem]-tich. If we assume that -tich means '10', the semantics is multiplicative: sech(s)-tich6*10sixty. Between 21 and 99, the structure is small-and-large and the semantics is additive: trije-en-sech(s)tich3+60sixty-three. In units of 100, 1000 and higher, the order is small before large again, but the semantics is multiplicative: trijehûndert3*100three hundred, seistûzen6*1000six thousand, fjouwerentritich-miljoen34*1000000thirty four million. Complex numbers larger than 100 are built from the building blocks just described: the number 363 is trijehûnderttrije-en-sechtich(3*100)+(3+60)three hundred-sixtythree.
The formation of cardinals can be schematized as follows (according to Booij (2010)):
- 13-19: no overt conjunction, lower number before higher number;
- 21-99: conjunction, lower number before higher number;
- > 100: optional conjunction before the last numeral, higher number before lower number.
In temporal expressions (phrases of time), the cardinals get the suffix -en:
A condition is that the cardinal should stand alone; it may not be followed by a noun:
*nei fiv-en oere |
after five-SUFF hour |
after five o'clock |
In this case oereo'clock is expressed, and the cardinal does not get the suffix -en. In case of an elliptic construction, when the noun oere is omitted, the suffix -en is obligatorily added to the numeral.
A condition for the presence of the suffix is that the numeral should be preceded by one of the following prepositions: foarbefore, neiafter, tsjinagainst, bynear, om ... hinnearound and healweihalf past. In spoken Frisian, omaround of the circumfix om ... hinnearound can be left out, as in acht oere hinne stapten wy yn 'e autoaround eight o'clock we got into the car.
The preposition tuskenbetween may be used when the elliptic clocktimes are coordinated:
tusken fiv-en en seiz-en |
between five-SUFF and six-SUFF |
between five and six o'clock |
The construction om NUM-en en NUM-en, for instance in om trij-en en fjouwer-enaround three-SUFF and four-SUFFsomewhere between three and four o'clock is slightly idiomatic.
Although Dutch has a comparable construction, the Frisian system is more elaborated. Dutch lacks the suffix if exact clock times are involved, like half past or a quarter to:
The preposition healweihalf past not only denotes a temporal phrase, but can also be used as a place indicator:
Healwei de dyk fan Boalsert nei Snits krige er in lekke bân |
halfway the dike from Boalsert to Snits got he a flat tyre |
Halfway between Boalsert and Snits he got a flat tyre |
See: Hoekstra (1988).
In Frisian we find a collective construction in the form of an Adposition Phrase (PP) with the preposition meiwith. This PP consists of a possessive pronoun and a numeral. To the numeral an ending -en is attached. There is a coreference relation between the possessive pronoun and the subject of the sentence, as in the following examples:
The suffix -en is usually dependent on the existence of the preposition. An independent phrase *ús fjouweren is ungrammatical. An exception is the first person plural subject pronoun wywe, which may be followed by a suffixed numeral, for instance in:
Wy trij-en steane garant foar in moaie foarstelling |
we tree-SUFF stand surety for a beautiful show |
The three of us guarantee a fine show |
The suffix can also be attached to the quantifiers alleall, beideboth and in stikmannicha few, as in the sentence: wy geane mei ús allenwe go with us all-SUFFwe go all together. In the following quote we also see an added adjunct:
Se (matte) mei hjar stikmannig-en fen kammeraten er moal (...) troch gien wæze | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
H.G. van der Veen, De kaertlizzer 20 [1856] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
They must with their few-SUFF of comrades there wild (...) through gone be | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is said that with their comrades they must have gone on the rampage |
The adjunct fen kammeraten further characterizes the subject sethey. Another example of such an adjunct headed by the preposition fanof is mei ús trij-en fan boerenwith us three-SUFF of farmers, which means with the three of us, being farmers. This kind of adjunction seems to be disappearing in the present-day language, however.
The ending -en is the normal plural suffix that we also find in nouns. However, as Booij (2010:234-235) points out with respect to the comparable construction in Dutch, there is a problem here. In Frisian and Dutch, there is a regular distribution between the two available plural suffixes -en and -s. The suffix -en is attached to stressed syllables and -s to unstressed ones. According to this system, fjouwerfour, with a schwa in its second syllable, would regularly take the plural suffix -s. This is clear from an example in which fjouwer really acts as a noun:
It famke hie trije fjouwer-s op har rapport |
the girl had three four-PL on her report |
The girl had three grades 4 on her report |
Hence, it appears from this particular construction that -en is not the ordinary plural morpheme, but something else. This 'something else' makes sense if we analyze the construction as a case of ellipsis. It seems that something like PERSON has been omitted here. The ending -en, then, would be an instance of special morphology connected to ellipsis. This view makes the more sense because of the coreference relation with the subject, which might then be viewed as a kind of antecedent, although not in the standard way. This could also be an explanation of the fact that such pluralized numerals cannot act as a subject themselves, as Booij (2005a:12) also notes for Dutch:
*Fjouweren kamen te let |
four-SUFF came too late |
Four people came too late |
The preposition that preferably combines with the possessive pronoun + numeral+-en is mei. The possessive pronoun is obligatory: *mei fjouweren. The phrase can not be expanded by an adjective:
*mei ús fjouwer aardig-en |
with our four nice-SUFF |
with four nice people |
Frisian also has a construction by + Numeral + -en which means in groups of [numeral] persons. For example:
Wy komme by ien-en, by twa-en en by trij-en yn 'e tsjerke |
we come by one-SUFF, by two-SUFF and by three-SUFF into the church |
We come to the church in groups of one, two and three persons |
The ending -en may also be found after the preposition fanof, in an adjunct after a noun denoting a set, as in in ploech fan fjouwerena group of four. Note that after these prepositions the possessive pronoun is lacking.
Dutch has the same construction as described above, but there is also a comparable construction in this language which is lacking in Frisian ((Popkema 2006:172). In this Dutch variant, the possessive pronoun is independent of the subject, it is always z'nhis. In Frisian, the possessive pronoun fully depends on the subject (see for example (6a)). However, under the influence of Dutch z'nhis, constructions like the one below tend to increase in present-day spoken language.
?Wy geane mei syn fjouwer-en |
we go with his four-SUFF |
We go with the four of us |
More information on this elliptic construction can be found in Dyk (2011:64-65).
In Frisian, as well as in Dutch, we can find the following elliptic construction:
It skip bruts yn trijen |
the ship broke in three-en |
The ship broke into three parts |
As can been seen in (11) and (12), apparently, something like the concept 'part' has been left out. Again, there is a suffix -en involved, and again it is attached to a number. Usually, the preposition yn is used as the head of the PP, although its counterpart út is not excluded:
In goede preek bestiet út trijen |
a good sermon consists out three-en |
A good sermon consists of three parts |
Quite idiosyncratic is the idiom yn twaen falle, literally to fall in two-en, i.e. to get a baby.
The suffixed numeral fjouwer-enfour-SUFF has a special sense in that it can refer to the feet of a horse. The adverbial phrase út 'e fjouwer-enout the four-SUFF means at a gallop. Op fjouwer-en setteon four-SUFF set is fit a horseshoe. The phrase op fjouwer-en be-slein wêzeon four-SUFF PREF-hit bebeing shoed has an extra metaphorical meaning: know how to go about things.
More information on this construction can be found in Dyk (2011:66-67).
Frisian has an idiomatic construction in N of Num, as shown in the examples below:
Of cannot be replaced by, for example, en or noch, so in N of Num is a fixed expression:
The two variable parts of the construction are the noun and the numeral. The noun is always morphologically singular, while it can be interpreted as plural, and cannot easily be modified (as can be seen in the two examples below). The numeral is always semantically plural.
Of is the most 'useless' element in the construction. It does not have a grammatical function, which will be the reason that it can be reduced or deleted. It is mostly deleted when there are two numerals in the construction:
in dei twa trije | ||||||||||||||
a day two three | ||||||||||||||
two or three days or so |
In case the numeral in this construction is twatwo, of is often deleted, for example:
de earste dei twa | ||||||||||||||
the first day two | ||||||||||||||
the first two days or so |
Next to this example, there is one case where of is deleted obligatorily:
in deimannich | ||||||||||||||
a day-some | ||||||||||||||
a few days |
This lexicalised expression is not very recognizable as an in N of Num construction, but it has some properties which are characteristic. The main one is the element in at the beginning. Furthermore, the noun has the same properties and restrictions as other nouns in this construction. Thus we also find expressions as in in oeremannicha couple of hours or in kearmannicha few times.
Instead of a numeral, the quantifier wat can also appear in the construction in N of Num:
Here, deletion of of is out, in contrast to the construction with the quantifier mannich in (21). Also modification of wat is not possible:
The expression in stik of wat functions as a quantifier in itself, meaning some or a couple of. Therefore the expression may be followed by a noun that is quantified, for instance in in stik of wat jierappelsa couple of potatoes. Next to the construction in stik of wat, the position of wat can be occupied by a numeral:
in stik of tsien jierappels |
a piece or ten potatoes |
about ten potatoes |
Literature on this construction can be found in Hoekstra (1992).
Cardinal numbers can also be used as names for ranks, scores, bank notes etc. (ik hie in tsienI had a tenI had the highest score) and then they behave like nouns, with the possibility of diminutive formation, pluralization etc. In diminutive formation, the cardinal gets an diminutive suffix, as in: tsientsjeten guilder/euro bill (or the Dutch loanword tientje), healtsjehalf a serving, certain coin and twaketwo eggs in a nest.
Multiplicatives are expressed by the cardinal numbers plus keartime: trije kear fjouwer is tolvethree times four is twelve. The noun kear always remains singular: ien kearonce, trije kearthree times. Keartime may also occur with ordinals: de tweintichste kearthe twentieth time. The suffix -ris ([rəs]) likewise indicates how many times something has happened: twaristwo times or trijeristhree times (see (25)). Nowadays the suffix -ris is mainly restricted to written Frisian. The same goes for the suffix -resom[rəsom] (see (1) in -resom). This affix can be used to define the size of the group: trijeresomin/with a group of three.
The cardinals hûndertone-hundred, tûzenthousand, miljoenmillion and miljardbillion can be considered a subset of the category of measure nouns (Booij (2010)). They have properties of nouns, in that they can be pluralized: hûndertenhundreds and tûzenenthousands. Hûndertone-hundred and tûzenthousand are different from miljoenmillion and miljardbillion, in that they can be used without a preceding numeral (a), where miljoen and miljard cannot (b) and (c):
Note that also the indefinite pronoun may count here as "preceding numeral":
in miljoen / miljard boeken |
More information about the syntactical aspects of cardinals may be found in Attribution of the Frisian Syntax.
- 2005Construction-dependent morphologyLingue e Linguaggio431-46
- 2010Construction morphologyOxford/New YorkOxford University Press
- 2010Construction morphologyOxford/New YorkOxford University Press
- 2010Construction morphologyOxford/New YorkOxford University Press
- 2011The morphology of Frisian nominal ellipsis
- 2011The morphology of Frisian nominal ellipsis
- 1988Hoe let is it?Friesch Dagblad20-08Taalsnipels 82
- 1992In dei of trije : tusken leksikon en syntaksisPhilologia Frisica anno 1990, Fryske Akademy63-89
- 2006Grammatica FriesUtrecht/ LjouwertUitgeverij Het Spectrum BV Prisma Woordenboeken en Taaluitgaven/ Fryske Akademy
- Dutch
- Frisian
- Afrikaans
- Phonological processes in casual speech
[88%] Dutch > Phonology > Phonological processes
- Intonation
[88%] Dutch > Phonology > Accent & intonation
- The spelling of linking elements in compounds
[87%] Dutch > Phonology > Spelling
- Phonotactics at the word level
[86%] Dutch > Phonology > Phonotactics
- Acoustic correlates of stress
[86%] Dutch > Phonology > Accent & intonation
- The phonological domain of Final Devoicing
[90%] Frisian > Phonology > Phonological Processes > Final devoicing
- /t/-deletion before the suffix -st
[90%] Frisian > Phonology > Phonological Processes
- Orthography
[90%] Frisian > Phonology > Orthography of Frisian
- /d/-insertion in the sequences /nər/, /lər/, and /rər/
[90%] Frisian > Phonology > Phonological Processes
- Breaking: phonetic aspects
[89%] Frisian > Phonology > Phonological Processes > Breaking
- The phonotactics of Afrikaans
[87%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonotactics
- Rhotacism
[87%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonological Processes > Consonant related processes
- d-deletion
[87%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonological Processes > Consonant related processes > Consonant cluster simplification: Overview
- Nasalization
[86%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonological Processes > Vowel related processes
- Homorganic glide insertion
[86%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonological Processes
- Dutch
- Frisian
- Afrikaans
- Case - the partitive construction
[91%] Dutch > Morphology > Inflection > Nouns > Case
- Cardinal numerals
[90%] Dutch > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Numerals
- Adjectival inflection
[88%] Dutch > Morphology > Inflection
- Possessive pronouns
[88%] Dutch > Morphology > Inflection > Pronouns
- -ing
[88%] Dutch > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Nouns > Nominal suffixes
- In prenominal position
[93%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Adjectives
- Case
[93%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Nouns
- -DIM (diminutive)
[93%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Nominal suffixes > Noun as base
- General categories
[92%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Verbs
- Ellipsis
[92%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Adjectives
- Inputs and input restrictions
[81%] Afrikaans > Morphology > Word formation > Affixation
- Affixation
[81%] Afrikaans > Morphology > Word formation
- Non-native affixes
[80%] Afrikaans > Morphology > Word formation > Affixation
- Cohering and non-cohering affixes
[79%] Afrikaans > Morphology > Word formation > Affixation
- Conversion
[79%] Afrikaans > Morphology > Word formation
- Dutch
- Frisian
- Afrikaans
- 2.2.1. Tests for distinguishing PP-complements from PP-adjuncts
[91%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 2 Projection of noun phrases I: complementation > 2.2. Prepositional and nominal complements
- 3.1.2. Modification by an intensifier
[91%] Dutch > Syntax > Adjectives and Adjective Phrases > 3 Projection of adjective phrases II: Modification > 3.1. Modification of scalar adjectives
- 1.3.3. Non-spatial/temporal prepositions
[91%] Dutch > Syntax > Adpositions and adpositional phrases > 1 Characteristics and classification > 1.3. A semantic classification of adpositional phrases
- 5.2.3.2. Special cases
[91%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 5 Determiners: articles and pronouns > 5.2. Pronouns > 5.2.3. Demonstrative pronouns
- 6.2.1. The three main construction types
[91%] Dutch > Syntax > Adjectives and Adjective Phrases > 6 Predicative use of the adjective phrase > 6.2. Complementive use of the adjective
- Restriction of the B-construction to modals
[88%] Frisian > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > Expression of irrealis
- The adverb of manner & degree sa 'so' and negation
[87%] Frisian > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > Negation
- Visual perception
[86%] Frisian > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > Evidentiality > Verbs of perception
- The third construction
[86%] Frisian > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > To-infinitival clauses > Verbal to-infinitives
- The past imperative as the expression of the irrealis
[86%] Frisian > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > Expression of irrealis
- Mood
[91%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Introduction to Verb Phrases > Characterization and classification
- Middle formation
[89%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Introduction to Verb Phrases > Alternations > Alternations involving the external argument
- Root modality
[89%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Introduction to Verb Phrases > Characterization and classification > Modality
- Attribution
[89%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Introduction to Adjective Phrases
- Finite declarative complement clauses: construction forms
[89%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Introduction to Verb Phrases > Complement clauses > Finite declarative complement clauses
