• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
The adverb of degree followed by an adjective and negation
quickinfo

Just as the adverb of manner and degree sa so may follow or precede negation, so may the combination of this adverb with a following adjective precede or follow negation. The following examples illustrate this:

1
a. Hjoed is it net sa kâld
today is it not so cold
Today it is not so cold
b. Hjoed is it sa kâld net
today is it so cold not
Today, it is not so cold

This first example represents a word order which is neutral with respect to presuppositions. The second example is presuppositional. It is the second order which is characteristically Frisian. The presence of the adverb of degree is crucial for placement of the predicative constituent to the left of negation (scrambling). If the adverb of degree is absent, then placement of the predicative constituent to the left of negation is ungrammatical, as shown below:

2
a. *Dizze is rottich net
this is rotten not
This one is not rotten
b. Dizze is net rottich
this is not rotten
This one is not rotten
readmore

The presuppositional order sa-Adj-Neg can also be found in case it is followed by a constituent which provides a fixed point for the degree denoted by the adjective. This constituent may semantically be related to an entity. It may have the form of a comparative constituent, as in the examples below:

3
a. Hja is sa moai net as har suster
she is as pretty not as her sister
She is rather less pretty than her sister
b. De boer wie dochs sa min net as de minsken ha woene
the farmer was DcP so bad not as the people have wanted
The farmer was not as bad as people made him out to be
c. It mantsje waard njonkenlytsen âld en it hynder ek. Sa âld net as syn baas, mar wol gauwer ynein
the man became gradually old and the horse also so old not as his boss but indeed faster tired
He got older and so did the horse. Not quite as old as his boss, but it did get tired sooner
d. Hy wie sa fet en sa grou net as dy't by it Maitiid fongen waard
he was so fat and so big not as that by the maytime caught was
It was not as fat and big as the one caught in May

Each sentence expresses that the degree ascribed to the subject falls below the degree described by the comparative constituent. In addition, there is a presupposition that the implied degree ascribed to the subject is significantly lower than the one ascribed to the comparative constituent. In addition, the constituent providing a fixed degree may semantically be related to a proposition. This proposition may have the form of a clause, as in the following examples:

4
a. Hy wie sa dom net dat er him it bloed hjit makke
he was so foolish not that he him the blood hot made
He was not so foolish that he would get worked up
b. Ik sil sa dryst net wêze om te ferheljen wat er sei
I shall so bold not be for to tell what he said
I will not be so bold as to tell what he said
c. Oan har ferhaal te hearren stiene sy der beide min foar, mar it koe sa min net wêze of der kaam wol in goede set op it boerd
from her story to hear stood they there both bad for but it could so bad not be or there came DcP a good move on the board
From what they said, they were in a bad position, but it could not be so bad that they did not produce a good move on the board
d. Hy woe sa ûnfatsoenlik net wêze en sjoch der fuort yn
he wanted so indecent not be and see R immediately in
He did not want to be so rude as to look in it immediately

Each sentence expresses that the degree ascribed to the subject falls below the degree described or implicated by the comparative constituent. The sentence in (4a) expresses that the actual degree of foolishness of the subject is rather less than the hypothetical degree of foolishness that the subject would have had if he had become worked up. The comparative constituent is realised as an embedded tensed clause in (4a). It is realised as an infinitival clause in (4b). It is realised as a balance clause in (4c): a main clause introduced by the disjunct of or. The example in (4d) features a comparative clause realised as an Imperativus-pro-Infinitivo, that is, an infinitival clause featuring a verb form that is homophonous to the imperative and that occurs in the first position of the clause. The adverb sa so appears to be specified by the following clause, hence it can be viewed as an anticipatory pronoun.

The presuppositional order cannot be used for deictic reference. This order is ungrammatical in a pointing context: in case somebody indicates with the fingers how small something is, this cannot be rendered by sa:

5
a. *It is sa lyts net
it is so small not
It is not that small
b. It is net sa lyts
it is not so small
It is not that small

The neutral order must be used. Furthermore, the presuppositional order presupposes that the degree of the adjective is substantial. As a result, the following sentence is weird:

6
a. *In mûs is sa grut net as in liuw
a mouse is so big not as a lion
A mouse is not as big as a lion
b. In mûs is net sa grut as in liuw
a mouse is not so big as a lion
A mouse is not so big as a lion

In addition, the presuppositional order does not allow the comparative phrase to be found to the left of the verb at the end of the middle field:

7
a. *Omdat er sa grut net as syn broer is
because he is so big not as his brother is
Because he is not as big as his brother
b. Omdat er net sa grut as syn broer is
because he is not so big as his brother is
Because he is not as big as his brother

Instead, the comparative comnstituent must follow the verb at the end of the middle field: put differently, it must be extraposed:

8
a. Omdat er sa grut net is as syn broer
because he is so big not is as his brother
Because he is not as big as his brother
b. Omdat er net sa grut is as syn broer
because he is not so big as his brother is
Because he is not as big as his brother

The construction can be intensified by adverbs such as hast quite and lang by far. Such adverbs may either be put in front of the presupposed construction as a whole or they can intervene between the Adjective Phrase (AP) and negation, as shown below:

9
a. Sels fine je it faaks lang sa moai net as oaren
yourself find you it maybe long so nice not as others
Maybe you yourself do not like it half as much as other people
b. Sels fine je it faaks sa moai lang net as oaren
yourself find you it maybe so nice long not as others
Maybe you yourself do not like it half as much as other people

The neutral order does not allow the intensifier and negation to be separated:

10
a. Sels fine je it faaks lang net sa moai as oaren
yourself find you it maybe long not so nice as others
Maybe you yourself do not like it half as much as other people
b. *Sels fine je it faaks net sa moai lang as oaren
yourself find you it maybe not so nice long as others
Maybe you yourself do not like it half as much as other people
c. *Sels fine je it faaks net lang sa moai as oaren
yourself find you it maybe not long so nice as others
Maybe you yourself do not like it half as much as other people

The generalisation seems to be that negation may not precede the intensifier. The intensifier hast normally means 'almost'. If it occurs in the presuppositional construction, however, it must mean quite:

11
Doe like alles hast sa slim net mear, Teade doarst it oansjen
then seemed everything almost so bad not anymore Teade dared it observe
Then everything did not seem quite as bad, Teade dared to have a look at it

It may be upposed that hast developed this meaning in this construction by being in the scope of negation. So the sentence expresses not just that the actual degree falls below a specific point, but that it falls below a stretch of degrees (expressed by the intensifier) below the specific degree. Anyhow, this meaning of hast is mostly found in the presuppositional construction, although it is sometimes found in the neutral order.

References
    printreport errorcite