• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents
Stress pattern of reduplications
quickinfo

Based on impressionistic data, reduplications are, across the board, described as having equal stress on both constituents, as amongst others by (Botha, R.P. 1988), (Combrink, J.G.H. 1990), (Conradie, C.J. 2004), (Raidt, E.H. 1981).

Closer observation has however revealed a more complex state of affairs as described below (Van Huyssteen, G.B.; Wissing, D.P. 2007).

    readmore

    Basically in reduplicated forms with monosyllabic members, like blaf-blaf, een-een, huil-huil, kort-kort, lag-lag, lui-lui, net-net, nou-nou, sing-sing, skreeu-skreeu, so-so, stil-stil, val-val, vloek-vloek, voel-voel, it is generally found that the first constituent carries main stress, albeit only of a slightly higher levels than the strong secondary stress of the second constituent. First-syllable stress is in compliance with the stress pattern of normal compounds. Note, however, that in reduplications composed of multisyllabic members, as in amper-amper, bietjie(s)-bietjie(s), bitter-bitter, doekoe-doekoe, kielie-kielie, kuier-kuier, vieserig-vieserig, Zama-zama, main stress tends to be on the last member. The latter also applies to semi-reduplications like flikker-flakker, tingel-tangel, tjingel-tjangel, wirrel-warrel (these examples from (Combrink, J.G.H. 1990:82).

    In experiments, it turns out that stress assignment in reduplications is sensitive to the type of reading task being used. Readers are strongly inclined to stress the second component of monosyllabic reduplications in a reading task in which the focus words are ebedded in carrier sentences, in contrast to stress on the first component when the same words occur within natural sentences. Such unstable behaviour is in accordance with the fact that stress assignment is not as explicit and clear-cut as in the case of normal compounds, an indication of the possible categorisation of reduplications as being a separate type of grammatical construction.

    References:
    • Hoekstra, Jarich1991Nijmakke en eigenoanretFriesch Dagblad21-09Taalsnipels 201
    Suggestions for further reading ▼
    phonology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    Show more ▼
    morphology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    Show more ▼
    syntax
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • Mood
      [74%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 1. Characterization and classification
    • Constructions with APs
      [74%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Adjective Phrases > Characteristics and classification
    • Root semantics
      [73%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 1. Characterization and classification > 1.5. Tense, modality and aspect > 1.5.2. Modality
    • Finite declarative complement clauses: Construction forms
      [73%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 5. Complement Clauses > 5.1. Finite declarative complement clauses
    • Inflection and derivation
      [73%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 1. Characterization and classification
    Show more ▼
    cite
    print
    This is a beta version.