• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents
Clause
quickinfo

The prepositional complement to the adjective may be realised as a pronominal PP plus a clause, as in the example below:

Example 1

Swanepoel is bly daaroor dat Griet ook kom.
Swanepoel is happy R.over (thereover) that Griet also comes
Swanepoel is happy (with it) that Griet is also coming.
readmore

The prepositional complement to the adjective may be realised as a pronominal PP plus a clause which relates to the anteceding R-pronoun. In some cases, the related PP can be dropped. In the example below, the finite clause is related to the discontinuous PP consisting of the preposition oorover and the R-pronoun daarthere, it

Example 2

Swanepoel is bly dat Griet ook kom.
Swanepoel is happy that Griet also comes
Swanepoel is happy that Griet also comes.
Example 3

Swanepoel is bly daaroor dat Griet ook kom.
Swanepoel is happy R.over that Griet also comes
Swanepoel is happy that Griet is also coming.

Dropping the PP is only allowed in the case where the complement clause occurs after the verb. If the clause is preposed to the beginning of the sentence, the PP must be present:

Example 4

*[Dat Griet ook kom], is Swanepoel bly.
that Griet also comes is Swanepoel happy
That Griet is also coming, is Swanepoel happy about.
Example 5

[Dat Griet ook kom], is Swanepoel bly oor.
that Griet also comes is Swanepoel happy over
That Griet is also coming is Swanepoel happy about.
Example 6

[Dat Griet ook kom], daaroor is Swanepoel bly.
that Griet also comes R.over is Swanepoel happy
Swanepoel is happy with the fact that Griet is also coming.

The sentences above also show that in the case of a preposed clause, the R-pronoun daarthere, it need not be phonologically realised.

Dropping the PP is only allowed with adjectives that take an optional PP. In other cases, the occurrence of the PP is obligatory. In the example below, the PP cannot be dropped without change of meaning, and correspondingly, it must also be present if a finite clause is present. In the following example, the related PP cannot be dropped in the presence of a clause.

Example 7

*Swanepoel is siek dat Griet so klets.
Swanepoel is sick that Griet chatters
Swanepoel is disgusted by Griet's chattering.
Example 8

Swanepoel is siek daarvoor dat Griet so klets.
Swanepoel is sick R.for that Griet so chatters
Swanepoel is disgusted by Griet's chattering.

This may be related to the fact that dropping the PP leads to a non-monotonic change in meaning. This has been illustrated below, where the first sentence does not entail the second:

Example 9

*Swanepoel is siek daarvoor.
Swanepoel is sick R.for
Swanepoel is sick of it
Example 10

Swanepoel is siek.
Swanepoel is sick
Swanepoel is sick

Although the clause can in theory also be realised as an infinitival clause, this is in actual practice a somewhat marginal (in the sense of 'infrequent') option.

Example 11

Ek is so siek om dit elke dag te hoor.
I am so sick PART it every day to hear
I am so sick of hearing it every day.
References:
    Suggestions for further reading ▼
    phonology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    Show more ▼
    morphology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    Show more ▼
    syntax
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • 6.6. PP subjects
      [87%] Dutch > Syntax > Adjectives and Adjective Phrases > 6 Predicative use of the adjective phrase
    • 3.1.3. Modification by a complex intensifying phrase
      [86%] Dutch > Syntax > Adjectives and Adjective Phrases > 3 Projection of adjective phrases II: Modification > 3.1. Modification of scalar adjectives
    • 6.5. Clausal subjects
      [86%] Dutch > Syntax > Adjectives and Adjective Phrases > 6 Predicative use of the adjective phrase
    • 2.4.1. Finite clauses
      [86%] Dutch > Syntax > Adpositions and adpositional phrases > 2 Projection of adpositional phrases: Complementation > 2.4. Clausal complements
    • 4.3.2. Modification of the comparative/superlative
      [86%] Dutch > Syntax > Adjectives and Adjective Phrases > 4 Projection of adjective phrases III: Comparison > 4.3. Comparison and degree modification
    • Finite declarative complement clauses: Syntactic distribution
      [82%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 5. Complement Clauses > 5.1. Finite declarative complement clauses
    • R-pronouns
      [81%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Adjective Phrases > Complementation > Quantificational nature of the argument and linear order
    • Verb complement clauses (Overview)
      [81%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases
    • Mood
      [81%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 1. Characterization and classification
    • Negative NP
      [80%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Adjective Phrases > Complementation > Quantificational nature of the argument and linear order
    Show more ▼
    cite
    print
    This is a beta version.