• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents
Adjective as base
quickinfo

Prefixation of an adjectival base mainly shows two different functions. A few prefixes express negation, of which is the most frequent one ûn-, cf. English un-. Negation often boils down to representing the other end of a scale. Hence, someone who is ûnaardichun-nice is not nice, but rather the opposite, i.e. it is a nasty person. The negative prefixes a- and yn- are restricted to bases of non-germanic origin. The prefix wan-, on the other hand, only takes native adjectives as its base. But it is not productive, and its derivations tend to be judged as old-fahioned.

The other important function is to intensify the interpretation of the base adjective. The semantics of these derivations can therefore be described as 'very [A]'. Thus if wietwet is prefixed by troch-, trochwiet means very wet. Etymologically, the intensifying prefixes have been grammaticalized from other lexical categories, like prepositions (yn- and oer-), an adjective in the case of poer-, a petrified case form of the universal quantifier alall (alder-), and even a short exclamative sentence (witte-).

The most extensive underlying category is formed by nouns which grammaticalized in such a way that they mainly or even only have an intensifying function. These derivations are known as elative compounds. An example is spikergeknail-crazycompletely crazy. Such nouns could be considered prefixes - actually prefixoids -, because of their intensifying function. Moreover, they fit in with the other formations, which can often be intensified even further by some remarkable processes. Quite common is reduplication with the conjunction enand, or preferably the older form ende, for instance in troch-ende-trochwietsoaked to the skin or spiker-en-spikergekcompletely crazy. Although rare, infixation can also be found as a means of further intensification. An example is strontwiet > stronttrochwietcompletely wet. However, elative compounds are truly compounds in a formal sense. Moreover, analyzing such formations as consisting of a prefix would extend the number of prefixes considerably. Their treatment has therefore been shifted to the part on compounding. Note that it is not only in the combination with nouns that adjectives can be intensified in a compound; we see the effect also with some first member verbs and adjectives.

Finally, the prefixes eigen- and nij- have a function of their own, independent of negation or intensification. Their meaning can best be described on the basis of the adjectives eigenown and nijnew from which these prefixoids have been grammaticalized. They are restricted in that they only combine with adjectives derived from past participles.

readmore

More details about the prefixes can be found by following the corresponding links:

References:
    Suggestions for further reading ▼
    phonology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • Nasalization
      [79%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonological Processes > Vowel related processes
    • The phonotactics of Afrikaans
      [78%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonotactics
    • Rhotacism
      [77%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonological Processes > Consonant related processes
    • d-deletion
      [76%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonological Processes > Consonant related processes > Consonant cluster simplification: Overview
    • r-deletion
      [75%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonological Processes > Consonant related processes
    Show more ▼
    morphology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • -DIM (diminutive)
      [85%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Nominal suffixes > Noun as base
    • ûnt-
      [84%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Prefixation > Verbal prefixes > Verb as base
    • witte-
      [83%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Prefixation > Adjectival prefixes > Adjective as base
    • In prenominal position
      [83%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Adjectives
    • -heid, -ens and -ichheid
      [83%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Nominal suffixes > Adjective as base
    Show more ▼
    syntax
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • 1.3.2. Deadjectival nouns
      [84%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 1 Characterization and classification > 1.3. Derivation of nouns
    • 1.3.1.4. Ge-nominalization
      [84%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 1 Characterization and classification > 1.3. Derivation of nouns > 1.3.1. Deverbal nouns
    • 1.3.1.3. Ing-nominalization
      [83%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 1 Characterization and classification > 1.3. Derivation of nouns > 1.3.1. Deverbal nouns
    • 2.2.3.1. Agentive er-nominalizations
      [83%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 2 Projection of noun phrases I: complementation > 2.2. Prepositional and nominal complements > 2.2.3. Deverbal nouns
    • 1.3.1.2. Inf-nominalization (Infinitival nominals)
      [82%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 1 Characterization and classification > 1.3. Derivation of nouns > 1.3.1. Deverbal nouns
    • Mood
      [82%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Introduction to Verb Phrases > Characterization and classification
    • Modification of the superlative
      [80%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Introduction to Adjective Phrases > Comparison by comparative, superlative and equative degree > Superlative
    • Equative
      [80%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Introduction to Adjective Phrases > Comparison by comparative, superlative and equative degree
    • Root modality
      [79%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Introduction to Verb Phrases > Characterization and classification > Modality
    • Epistemic modality
      [78%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Introduction to Verb Phrases > Characterization and classification > Modality
    Show more ▼
    cite
    print