• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents
Semantic classification of the missing verb following the non-finite complementiser
quickinfo

Verbless complements are not only found under modals but also under the non-finite complementiser omfor. An example is given below:

Example 1

Atsje mei der net oer om alle dagen spul mei de buorlju
Atsje may R not about for all days fight with the neighbours
Atsje does not like having a fight with her neighbours every day

The missing verb can be a light verb, such as geango, hawwehave, wêzebe or another light verb. If the missing verb is spelled out, it must have the form of a to-infinitive. The light verb can, somewhat marginally, also remain absent in case the non-finite complementiser clearly has a purposive interpretation, which means that it is not selected:

Example 2

a. De fûgel sloech mei de poat om los
the bird hit with the leg for loose
The bird kicked its leg in order to set itself free
b. De fûgel sloech mei de poat om los te kommen
the bird hit with the leg for loose to come
The bird kicked its leg in order to set itself free
References:
    Suggestions for further reading ▼
    phonology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    Show more ▼
    morphology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • General categories
      [65%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Verbs
    • -k
      [65%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Verbal suffixes > Noun as base
    • -jei
      [64%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Verbal suffixes > Noun as base
    • Strong and other irregular verbs
      [64%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Verbs
    • Personal pronouns
      [64%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Pronouns
    Show more ▼
    syntax
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • 6.2.1. Perfect auxiliaries
      [68%] Dutch > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 6 Projection of verb phrases IIIc:Complements of non-main verbs > 6.2. Non-main verbs selecting a participle
    • 2.2.3. Resultative constructions
      [67%] Dutch > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 2 Projection of verb phrases I:Argument structure > 2.2. Complementives (secondary predicates)
    • 2.2.3.1. Agentive er-nominalizations
      [67%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 2 Projection of noun phrases I: complementation > 2.2. Prepositional and nominal complements > 2.2.3. Deverbal nouns
    • 1.3.1.5. Er-nominalization
      [66%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 1 Characterization and classification > 1.3. Derivation of nouns > 1.3.1. Deverbal nouns
    • 3.2.3. Causative alternation (causative-inchoative alternation)
      [66%] Dutch > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 3 Projection of verb phrases II:Verb frame alternations > 3.2. Alternations involving the external argument
    Show more ▼
    cite
    print