• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents
No movement of the IPI-construction
quickinfo

An Imperativus-pro-Infinitivo (IPI)-construction cannot be preposed.

readmore

An IPI-construction cannot be moved, as is illustrated by the ungrammaticality of the following examples, in which an IPI has been preposed to the beginning of the matrix clause. The example below involves an adjunct IPI:

Example 1

a. Hy kin wol nei Geeske ta gean [en jou har it boek]
He can DcP to Geeske to go and give her the book
He could go to Geeske and give her the book
b. *[En jou har it boek] kin hy wol nei Geeske ta gean
and give her the book can he DcP to Geeske to go
And give her the book, he could go to Geeske

The example below illustrates that an argument IPI cannot be moved either:

Example 2

a. Ik bin net fan doel [en fertel har ús takomstplannen]
I am not of purpose and tell her our future.plans
I do not intend to tell them our plans for the future
b. *[En fertel har ús takomstplannen] bin ik net fan doel
And tell them our future.PLans am I not of purpose
To tell them our plans for the future, I do not intend to
References:
    Suggestions for further reading ▼
    phonology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
      Show more ▼
      morphology
      • Dutch
      • Frisian
      • Afrikaans
      • Emphasis
        [58%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Adverbs
      • Adverb as base
        [58%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Adverbial suffixes
      • Reflexive and reciprocal pronouns
        [57%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Pronouns
      • Cardinal numbers
        [56%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Numerals
      • -k
        [56%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Verbal suffixes > Verb as base
      Show more ▼
      syntax
      • Dutch
      • Frisian
      • Afrikaans
      • 3.2.1.1. General properties of passives
        [62%] Dutch > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 3 Projection of verb phrases II:Verb frame alternations > 3.2. Alternations involving the external argument > 3.2.1. Passivization
      • 9.2.2. Modal infinitives
        [62%] Dutch > Syntax > Adjectives and Adjective Phrases > 9 Participles and infinitives: their adjectival use > 9.2. Attributive use
      • 2.2.3. Resultative constructions
        [61%] Dutch > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 2 Projection of verb phrases I:Argument structure > 2.2. Complementives (secondary predicates)
      • 3.2.2.4. The impersonal middle construction
        [61%] Dutch > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 3 Projection of verb phrases II:Verb frame alternations > 3.2. Alternations involving the external argument > 3.2.2. Middle Formation
      • 4.4.2. Bare infinitivals
        [61%] Dutch > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 4 Projection of verb phrases IIIa:Selection of clauses/verb phrases > 4.4. Three main types of infinitival argument clauses
      • Negative NP
        [57%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Adjective Phrases > Complementation > Type of NP in PP and linear order
      • Complementation
        [57%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Adjective Phrases
      • Inf-nominalization (Infinitival nominals)
        [56%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 1. Characterization and classification > 1.3 Derivation of nouns > 1.3.1. Deverbal nouns
      • Epistemic usage
        [56%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 1. Characterization and classification > 1.5. Tense, modality and aspect > 1.5.2. Modality
      • PP
        [56%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Adjective Phrases > Complementation
      Show more ▼
      cite
      print