• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents
The interface between phonology and morphology
quickinfo

Morphology and phonology interact in Dutch in a number of ways. This interaction is referred to as ‘interface’: morphological information may play a role in the computation of the phonological form of words, and must therefore be visible to phonology, and phonological information concerning input forms may play a role in the application of morphological processes (see also Booij 1995, 1998, 2002, 2002). The following types of interaction occur:

  1. the morphological structure of a word co-determines its prosodic structure, and thus its phonetic realization; for instance, in compounds the word-internal morphological boundary coincides with a syllable boundary, as in balkankerbalk-ankerbeam-brace, stock-anchor with the syllabification [ˈbɑlk.ɑŋ.kǝr] (compare balkankerbal-kanker[ˈbɑl.kɑŋ.kǝr]testicle cancer).
  2. the morphological structure plays a role in assigning stress patterns to complex words. For instance, in compounds main stress is on the first constituent as in tafelpoot[[tafel][poot]][ˈta.fəl.pot]table-leg.
  3. in Dutch, both stems and affixes exhibit allomorphy, and the selection of an allomorph requires access to both phonological and morphological information. For instance, the choice between -er and -aar depends on the last syllable of the stem: -aar is selected after an unstressed syllable, -er elsewhere as illustrated by the words wandelaar[ˈʋɑndəlar]wanderer and loper[ˈlopər]runner.
  4. there are phonological output constraints on complex words. For example, the choice between the two competing nominal plural suffixes -s and -en is determined by the phonological requirement that a plural noun ends in a trochee. Hence, we get minimal pairs like kanonskanon-s[ˈkanɔns]canons versus kanonnenkanonn-en[kaˈnɔnən]guns.

readmore

For more information on the interface between phonology and morphology see also the following topics:

References:
  • Booij, Geert1995The phonology of DutchOxfordOxford University Press
  • Booij, Geert1998Prosodic output constraints in morphologyKehrein, Wolfgang & Wiese, Richard (eds.)Phonology and morphology of the Germanic languagesTübingenNiemeyer143-163
  • Booij, Geert2002The morphology of DutchOxfordOxford University Press
  • Booij, Geert2002Prosodic restrictions on affixation in DutchBooij, Geert & Marle, Jaap van (eds.)Yearbook of Morphology 2001DordrechtKluwer183-202
Suggestions for further reading ▼
phonology
  • Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show more ▼
morphology
  • Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show more ▼
syntax
  • Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show more ▼
cite
print