• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents
Meaning of intransitive adpositions
quickinfo

Particles with an external argument have a meaning of their own. Particles without an external argument have their meaning to some extent determined by the verb which selects them.

readmore

Particles with an external argument can be the predicate of a predication mediated by a copula, as shown below:

Example 1

a. De boffert is [hielendal] op
the cake is completely up
The cake is completely finished
b. Jouke is ûnder
Jouke is downstairs
Jouke is downstairs

Particles without an external argument have their meaning to some extent determined by the verb:

Example 2

a. Margriet belle him op
Margriet phoned him up
Margriet phoned him up
b. Margriet belle him ôf
Margriet phoned him down
Margriet phoned to cancel an appointment with him

In such cases, the particle may still contribute to the verbal aspect. The following contrast shows that the particle is incompatible with atelic or non-resultative aspect:

Example 3

a. Margriet belle oeren lang
Margriet phoned hours long
Margriet phoned for hours
b. *Margriet belle oeren lang op
Margriet phoned hours long
Margriet phoned up for hours
References:
    Suggestions for further reading ▼
    phonology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • Ambisyllabicity
      [50%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonotactics
    • Nasalization
      [50%] Afrikaans > Phonology > Phonological Processes > Vowel related processes
    Show more ▼
    morphology
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • -jei
      [60%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Verbal suffixes > Noun as base
    • -sel
      [58%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Nominal suffixes > Verb as base
    • Derivation
      [57%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation
    • -DIM (diminutive)
      [55%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Nominal suffixes > Noun as base
    • -enis
      [55%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Nominal suffixes > Verb as base
    Show more ▼
    syntax
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • 1.2.4. Intransitive adpositions
      [60%] Dutch > Syntax > Adpositions and adpositional phrases > 1 Characteristics and classification > 1.2. A formal classification of adpositional phrases
    • 2.2.3.1. Agentive er-nominalizations
      [59%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 2 Projection of noun phrases I: complementation > 2.2. Prepositional and nominal complements > 2.2.3. Deverbal nouns
    • 1.3.1.5. Er-nominalization
      [59%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 1 Characterization and classification > 1.3. Derivation of nouns > 1.3.1. Deverbal nouns
    • 2.1. General observations
      [59%] Dutch > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 2 Projection of noun phrases I: complementation
    • 2.2.3. Resultative constructions
      [59%] Dutch > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 2 Projection of verb phrases I:Argument structure > 2.2. Complementives (secondary predicates)
    • Complementation
      [58%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Adjective Phrases
    • Excessive degree te 'too'
      [58%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Adjective Phrases > Modification and Degree Quantification
    • Inf-nominalization (Infinitival nominals)
      [58%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Nouns and Noun Phrases > 1. Characterization and classification > 1.3 Derivation of nouns > 1.3.1. Deverbal nouns
    • Mood
      [57%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 1. Characterization and classification
    • Pragmatics
      [56%] Afrikaans > Syntax > Verbs and Verb Phrases > 1. Characterization and classification > 1.5. Tense, modality and aspect > 1.5.2. Modality
    Show more ▼
    cite
    print