• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents
Possessive pronouns
quickinfo

Possessive pronouns express the fact that one entity is owned by or belongs to one or another. They are elements such as mynmy or minesmine. Though traditionally called pronouns, they have at first sight little in common with pronouns. However, they refer to NPs and can occur as their place-holders. Possessives such as myn occur as attributive elements in noun phrases, as in myn manmy husband. The possessive mines, by contrast, is used predicatively; it appears as an independent noun phrase (NP), e.g. in copular constructions such as dat binne dyn wurden, net minesthose are your words, not mine.

Possession involves two entities, a possessor (the object that expresses a possessive relation) and a possessum (the object or person possessed). Attributely used possessives in Frisian show agreement with the possessor (made explicit below by mentioning the corresponding personal pronoun) but not with the possessum noun, in person, number and - for third person possessors - gender ((1c) and (1d)). For singular possessors, we get the following options:

Example 1

a. (I and) myn man/hûs/redens
(I and) my husband/house/skates
b. (Do en) dyn man/hûs/redens
(You and) your husband/house/skates
c. (Hy en) syn man/hûs/redens
(He and) his husband/house/skates
d. (Hja en) har man/hûs/redens
(She and) her husband/house/skates

It is also possible that the possessive pronoun is stranded, i.e. that the possessee noun is not expressed. If that is the case, the pronoun receives a special ending (cf. a form like mine in English):

Example 2

Dizze tas is brún, mar mines is swart
This bag is brown, but mine is black

Possessive pronouns can occur in a combination of two NPs, as an alternative to the possessive construction with the former genitive ending -s:

Example 3

a. Marc syn fyts
Marc poss.3sg.m bike
Marc's bike
b. Myn ferstoarne mem har broer
poss.1sg died mother poss.3sg.f brother
My late mother's brother

If the identity of the possessor is clear from the context, then a possessive relation can also be expressed by a definite article:

Example 4

Hja kjimt it hier
she combs the hair
She combs her hair
readmore
[+] Forms

The paradigm of possessives shows three grammatical features: person, gender and number. The table below gives the paradigm.

Table 1
Person Singular Plural
1st person mynmine úsour
2nd person jim(me)yours
informal dynyours
polite joyours
3rd person har/harrentheirs
masculine synhis
feminine harhers
[hide extra information]
x Dutch influence

In Dutch (see possessive pronouns in Dutch), there is an exceptional situation for plural possessors: if the possessor is 1st person plural, the gender and number of the possessum noun also have an influence on the form of the possessive ((5a) and (5b)); the possessive pronoun is inflected as an adjective. Such inflection does not exist in Frisian, see (c):

Example 5

a. ons huis
our house.SG
our house
b. onze ouders
our parents.PL
our parents
c. *úze âlden
our parents.PL
our parents

However, under Dutch influence the inflected form úze is used in Frisian more and more.

In elliptic constructions, possessive pronouns are not allowed in their canonical form:

Example 5

*Wy nimme net syn auto mar myn
we take not his car but my ___
We do not take his care but mine

Instead, the language user has to invoke a special form of the pronouns, the free possessives. These special forms of the pronous are used in elliptical constructions:

Example 6

Wy nimme net syn auto mar mines
we take not his car but mine-es
We do not take his car but mine

For all persons, both singular and plural, this special form can be built with the help of a suffix -es. The paradigm is given in the table below:


Table 2
Person Singular Plural
1st person minesmine uzesours
2nd person jimmesyours
informal dinesyours
polite jowesyours
3rd person harreshers
masculine sineshis
feminine harreshers

Alongside the suffix -es various alternatives are available for the three singular forms ending in /n/ (myn, dyn, syn). They mainly consist of the suffixes -en or -t, for instance in minen or mynt. Besides, stacking of these suffixes is possible, also in combination with -es. So we also have the forms minent, mynten and myntes.

The indefinite pronoun menone, you also has a possessive counterpart, which is jins. In elliptical use, this displays a form ending in -es or -en: jinnes or jinnen. In addition, but contrary to the other possessive pronous, the base form jins may also occur elliptically. The form *jint does not occur.

[hide extra information]
x Literature

The information on elliptical forms is mainly based on Dyk (2011). More details in Hoekstra (1988).

[+] Use

Possessive pronouns occur in two functions in the sentence, either attributively within the noun phrase (e.g. mynmy) or as free possessives (e.g. minesmine). The possessive pronouns always stand in front of the noun (e.g. myn hûsmy house, *hûs mynmy house).

The choice between the forms of the attributive possessive is determined by the person and number feature of the possessor; in the third person singular, gender is an additional factor. Male persons are referred to by synhis, sineshis etc, and female persons have harher and harresher. If the possessor is a person referred to by a neuter gender noun, the possessive does not have the expected neuter gender. Instead, the masculine or feminine possessive is used, depending on the gender of the person.

Example 8

Dat famke is mei *syn/har feint kaam
that girl.N is with his/her friend come
That girl has come with her boyfriend

In Frisian, animals are always referred to by way of the male possessive pronoun synhis etc., even if an animal of female gender is involved, for instance:

Example 9

de ko syn/*har tosken
the cow his/her teeth
the cow's teeth

Likewise, inanimates always have synhis. For example, one could refer to the mast of a boatboat (common gender) or skipship (neuter) as syn mêst, but not as *har mêst (possibly, as this is an instance of inalienable possession, the definite article as in de mêst should be prefered here; see the section on inalienable possession below).

A possessive relation can also be expressed by adding a suffix -s to the noun:.

Example 10

a. Fryslâns marren
Friesland.poss lakes
the lakes of Friesland
b. Hoekstra's artikel
Hoekstra.poss article
the article written by Hoekstra

This suffix is dealt with more extensively in the topic on nominal case (see also Hoekstra (1989)).

The use of this suffix is restricted, however. The following expression, for example, is not possible:

Example 11

*de hûns sturt
the dog.poss tail
the tail of the dog

However, the alternative of a construction consisting of the possessor noun plus a possessive pronoun is available, but in only combination with animate possessors:

Example 12

a. de hûn syn sturt
the dog his tail
The tail of the dog
b. Hoekstra syn artikel
Hoekstra his article
The article written by Hoekstra
c. *Fryslân syn marren
Friesland his lakes
The lakes of Friesland

In the examples given in (12), however, it is always possible to use the alternative of a periphrastic construction with the preposition fanof:

Example 13

de marren fan Fryslan
the lakes of Friesland
The lakes of Friesland
it artikel fan Hoekstra
the article of Hoekstra
The article written by Hoekstra
de sturt fan de hûn
the tail of the dog
The dog's tail

The possessor in the double NP construction as in (14a) can be questioned: the possessor is replaced by the relevant interrogative pronoun wawho, as in sentence (14b). In expressing the same question, also the genitive form waanswhose of the interrogative pronoun (14c) could be used (see also interrogative pronouns):

Example 14

a. de boargemoaster syn hûs
the mayor his house
the mayor's house
b. Wa syn hûs?
who his house
Whose house?
c. Waans hûs?
whose house
Whose house?

Waans cannot be used independently. In ellipsis, a construction of wa plus the usual elliptic forms of the possessive pronoun has to be used:

Example 15

a. *Waans is dat?
Whose is that?
b. Wa sines is dat?
Whose is that?
[hide extra information]
x Close family

The possessive relation with one's closest relatives (parents, grandparents, brothers, sisters, children) is not expressed with a singular pronoun like mynmy, but rather with a plural like úsour:

Example 16

*myn/ús heit
my/our father
my father
Example 17

*myn/ús âlden
my/our parents
my parents

Likewise, one can speak of ús Janmy brother Jan or jim pakeyour.PL grandfatheryour grandfather.

However, under the influence from Dutch, but possibly also because the role of the family in society is decreasing, expressions like myn heit and myn âlders can be heard more and more nowadays.

[+] Inalienable possession

Inalienable possession means that entities like body parts, clothes and parts of clothes and also relatives do not exist apart from a possessor. In Frisian, it is possible that this possessive relation with the noun is expressed by the definite article (see also Hoekstra (1991)):

Example 18

Jan wasket de fuotten
Jan washes the feet
Jan washes his feet

In the example above, in which a possessive pronoun is not used, it is clear that de fuottenthe feet are Jan's own feet. In the example below syn fuottenhis feet are the feet of someone else:

Example 19

Jan wasket syn fuotten
Jan.N washes his.poss feet
Jan washes the feet of him

Nowadays, under influence from Dutch, this can also be interpreted as Jan's own feet. Besides, it is possible to say

Example 20

Jan wasket him de fuotten
Jan washes him the feet
Jan washes his feet

This sentence is ambiguous. The first possibility is that him is coreferential with Jan, and hence it's Jan's feet that are washed. In the other, i.e. benefactive, reading, him is not coreferential with Jan, and then the feet belong to someone else.

However, this use of a definite article is only possible in inalienable possession and not with nouns expressing a non-living entity. In sentences like (21) the article de does not obligatorily express a possessive relation with Jan:

Example 21

Jan fervet de stoel
Jan paints the chair
Jan paints the/his chair

This is because de stoelthe chair stands in a less direct relationship with Jan then fuottenfeet. It is clear that fuotten belong to a human being, but the chair does not necessarily belong to the person who paints it. The example Jan fervet him de stoel can only have a benefactive reading in which Jan is painting a chair for somebody else.

[hide extra information]
x Syntax

See for more details of inalienable possession the topics on relational nouns, inalienable possession and coreference and syntactic binding in the part on Frisian syntax.

References:
  • Dyk, Siebren2011The morphology of Frisian nominal ellipsis
  • Hoekstra, Jarich1988Dit is myntesFriesch Dagblad02-01Taalsnipels 58
  • Hoekstra, Jarich1989De hûn syn sturtFriesch Dagblad07-01Taalsnipels 93
  • Hoekstra, Jarich1991Besitlike lidwurdenFriesch Dagblad15-06Taalsnipels 189
Suggestions for further reading ▼
phonology
  • Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show more ▼
morphology
  • Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show more ▼
syntax
  • Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show more ▼
cite
print