• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents

Derivation is the formation of new lexemes by means of affixation, i.e. the attachment of bound morphemes to the stem forms of lexemes. The word classes that can be extended by derivation are the open or lexical classes of a language: nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs. Like Dutch, Afrikaans makes use of both prefixation and suffixation (but not of infixation). Moreover, Afrikaans and Dutch have a number of circumfixes, a combination of a prefix and a suffix with a collective meaning, for example ge...te, as in ge·boom·te [ge[boom](N)te](N)collection of trees. The simultaneous use of a prefix and a suffix can also be found in so called participia praeverbalia such as be·haar·d [be[haar](N)d](A)hairy (from haar hair). In addition, Afrikaans and Dutch also also use conversion to derive new lexemes.


    Derivation may change the word class of the input lexeme. The inputs for a particular derivational process are often of one particular lexical category (N, V, or A), and the outputs are also of a specific lexical category. There is also derivation in which input word and output word differ only in lexical subcategory. For instance, intransitive verbs can become transitive verbs. The processes available in Afrikaans are:

    Table 1
    Input > Output Type of change Source Derived word
    A > N Suffixation mooibeautiful mooi·heid[[mooi](A)[heid](NMLZ)](N)beauty
    Conversion Katoliekcatholic Katoliek[[Katoliek](A)](N)catholic (person)
    V > N Suffixation werkto work werk·er[[werk](V)[er](NMLZ)](N)worker
    Prefixation praatto talk ge·praat[[ge](NMLZ)[praat](V)](N)talking, chitchat
    Conversion valto fall val[[val](V)](N)fall
    N > N Suffixation moedermother moeder·skap[[moeder](N)[skap](NMLZ)](N)motherhood
    Prefixation mensman, human on·mens[[on](CN)[mens](N)](N)brute, beast
    N > A Suffixation meestermaster meester·lik[[meester](N)[lik](ADJZ)](A)masterly
    V > A Suffixation leesto read lees·baar[[lees](V)[baar](ADJZ)](A)readable
    A > A Suffixation bloublue blou·erig[[blou](A)[erig](ADJZ)](A)blueish
    Prefixation gewoonusual, common on·gewoon[[on](CN)[gewoon](A)](A)unusual
    N > V Suffixation fouterror fout·eer[[fout](N)[eer](VBZ)](V)to err
    Prefixation huishouse ver·huis[[ver](VBZ)[huis](N)](V)to move (to another house)
    Conversion bankbank (financial instituition) bank[[bank](N)](V)to bank (your money)
    A > V Suffixation kalmcalm kalm·eer[[kalm](A)[eer](VBZ)](V)to calm down
    Prefixation bleekpale ver·bleek[[ver](VBZ)[bleek](A)](V)to turn pale
    Conversion suiwerpure suiwer[[suiwer](A)](V)to purify
    V > V Prefixation krapto scratch be·krap[[be](CN)[krap](V)](V)to bescratch
    There is a tendency for prefixation to be category-neutral (there are four exceptions: be-, ver-, ont- and ge-), whereas suffixation is often category-changing.

    [hide extra information]

    The asymmetry between prefixation and suffixation has led some reseachers of morphology to adopt the so-called Right-hand Head Rule (RHR), proposed for English by (Williams 1981), as a principle that is also valid for Afrikaans and Dutch. This rule says that the rightmost constituent of a complex word is the head of that word, and hence determines the syntactic (sub)category of the complex word. For instance, the word lees·baarreadable is an adjective thanks to its head, the suffix –baar. As suffixes are the rightmost elements in a structure, they are predicted to be category-determining, while prefixes are not. Category-determinination does not necessarily mean category change. There are suffixes, for  example, that create nouns from nouns. However, the suffix will determine the syntactic subcategory of its output. For instance, nouns with a diminutive suffix. Depending on one’s theory of syntax and morphology, the notion 'head' can be more or less useful. In the analysis of compounds, the most syntax-like kind of word-formation, it has the advantage that many properties of the whole compound can be predicted from the properties of one of its constituents. After all, the head constituent also occurs as an independent word and has independent properties. If affixes, however, are treated as heads, the theory has to equip them with categorial properties. See (Bauer 1990) for a critical discussion of the notion 'head' in morphology.

    Afrikaans present some counterevidence to the RHR: the nominalizing prefix ge- and a number of verbalizing prefixes have category-changing power. What remains true, however, is that in Afrikaans all suffixes (but not all prefixes) are category-determining.The relevance of the RHR for Dutch is defended by (Trommelen and Zonneveld 1986). They are, however, forced, to introduce certain ad hoc rules in order to cope with the cases of category-changing prefixation. Another attempt to save the RHR as a generalization for Dutch is (Neeleman 1993)which also deals with the class of category-changing prefixes.

    Adverbs are special: they can only be outputs, not inputs of derivation. They can be derived from adjectives by means of suffixation, for instance loss·ies loosely from losloose. Exceptions are strakk·iessoon and effen·tjies for a moment which are derived without meaning change from the adverbs straksshortly and effensslightly.

    Some derivational processes can be used simultaneously in the formation of multiply complex words. For instance, the prefix on- and the suffix –baar work together in the formation of the adjective on·uit·staan·baar unbearable that has no positive counterpart *uit·staan·baar. Such cases are then analysed as a circumfix on...baar. Note that some scholars (e.g. (Booij 2010)) differ from this viewpoint, since they argue that this pattern can be obtained by the combination of two independent word-formation processes.

    • Bauer, Laurie1990Be-heading the WordJournal of Linguistics261-31
    • Neeleman, Ad & Schipper, Joleen1993Verbal prefixation in Dutch: thematic evidence for conversionBooij, Geert & Van Marle, Jaap (eds.)Yearbook of Morphology 1992Kluwer57-92
    • Trommelen, Mieke & Zonneveld, Wim1986Dutch morphology: evidence for the right-hand head ruleLinguistic Inquiry17147-170
    Suggestions for further reading ▼
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    Show more ▼
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    • Weak verbs
      [85%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Verbs
    • Derivation
      [83%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation
    • -k
      [83%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Verbal suffixes > Noun as base
    • -s
      [83%] Frisian > Morphology > Word formation > Derivation > Suffixation > Adverbial suffixes > Noun as base
    • Number
      [83%] Frisian > Morphology > Inflection > Nouns
    Show more ▼
    • Dutch
    • Frisian
    • Afrikaans
    Show more ▼
    This is a beta version.