• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents
7.1.3. Conclusion
quickinfo

This section has discussed ways of recognizing apparent cases of verb clusters. Section 7.1.1 started by discussing the fact that sequences of verbs in clause-final position do not only arise as the result of verb clustering in the technical sense of the word, but can also be the result of a process that we referred to as remnant extraposition. In order to distinguish the two cases, we proposed to use the infinitivus-pro-participio effect as a diagnostic. According to this test (i) perception verbs like horen'to hear' in (35a) obligatorily form a cluster with an embedded bare infinitive, (ii) propositional verbs like beweren'to claim' in (35b) cannot form a cluster with an embedded te-infinitive, and (iii) irrealis verbs like proberen'to try' in (35c) optionally form a cluster with an embedded te-infinitive. We also discussed a number of additional facts supporting these conclusions.

Example 35
a. dat ik een liedje heb horen/*gehoord zingen.
IPP obligatory
  that  a song  have  hear/heard  sing
  'that Iʼve heard singing a song.'
b. dat Jan dat boek heeft beweerd/*beweren te lezen.
IPP impossible
  that  Jan  that book  has  claimed/claim  to read
  'that Jan has claimed to read that book.'
c. dat Jan dat boek heeft geprobeerd/proberen te lezen.
IPP optional
  that  Jan that book  has  claimed/claim to read
  'that Jan has tried to read that book.'

Section 7.1.2 continued by showing that we cannot always decide at face value whether past/passive participles and ( te-)infinitives are verbal and thus part of the clause-final verb cluster: past/passive participle and te-infinitives may exhibit adjectival behavior, as a result of which they may end up left-adjacent to the verb cluster in their syntactic function as complementive; bare infinitives may be nominalized, as a result of which they may end up left-adjacent to the verb cluster in their syntactic function as direct object. Since complementives and direct objects are not part of verb clusters, we should exclude such cases in our discussion of verb clusters. The merit of taking this decision is that it enables us to account for the word order in verb clusters by means of the three relatively simple generalizations in (36), which are based on Den Besten & Broekhuis (1989) and which will be taken as our point of departure in the investigation of the linearization of verb clusters in Section 7.3.

Example 36
a. Generalization I: Past/passive participles either precede of follow their governing auxiliary.
b. Generalization II: T e-infinitives follow their governing verb.
c. Generalization III: Bare infinitives follow their governing verb (in clusters consisting of three or more verbs).
readmore
References:
  • Besten, Hans den & Broekhuis, Hans1989Woordvolgorde in de werkwoordelijke eindreeksGLOT1279-137
cite
print
This topic is the result of an automatic conversion from Word and may therefore contain errors.
A free Open Access publication of the corresponding volumes of the Syntax of Dutch is available at OAPEN.org.